In recent years, the video game industry has seen a dramatic shift in the way developers create and distribute their games. The rise of digital distribution platforms such as Steam, GOG, and the Epic Games Store have made it easier than ever for developers to get their games out to the public. However, one platform has come under fire for its predatory business model: Unity.

Unity is a popular game engine used by many developers to create their games. It is easy to use and has a wide range of features, making it a popular choice among game developers. However, Unity’s business model has come under scrutiny for its predatory practices. Unity charges developers a 5% royalty fee on all sales of their games, regardless of the platform they are sold on. This fee is significantly higher than other digital distribution platforms, which typically charge a much lower percentage or even no fee at all.

Furthermore, Unity has been accused of using its position of power to strong-arm developers into using their services. Unity has been known to threaten to delist games from their platform if developers do not comply with their demands. This has caused frustration among many developers who feel that they are being taken advantage of by Unity.

The predatory practices of Unity have caused many developers to look for alternatives to the platform. Many have turned to open-source game engines such as Godot and Unreal Engine, which offer more freedom and flexibility than Unity. Others have chosen to self-publish their games, bypassing the need for a platform altogether.

Unity’s predatory business model has caused frustration among game developers, and it is clear that something needs to change. Developers should be free to choose the platform that best suits their needs without fear of retribution or exploitation. Until then, it is up to developers to find alternatives that will allow them to create and distribute their games without fear of exploitation.